Sustainability measurement & disclosure
ESRS E3
The European Sustainability Reporting Standard setting disclosure requirements on water and marine resources.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
ESRS E3 is the topical European Sustainability Reporting Standard on water and marine resources, adopted under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. It covers the undertaking's impacts and dependencies on water (withdrawals, consumption, discharges) and on marine resources, including activities in water-stressed areas and across the value chain.
References
standard scope
Delegated Regulation 2023/2772, first set
Overview
What it means
Disclosures follow the common ESRS structure of policies, actions, targets and metrics — including water consumption and recycling metrics and information on marine-resource use. E3 applies where the double-materiality assessment identifies water and marine resources as material, which is typical for food and beverage, apparel, mining and utilities.
How it is used
Used by CSRD reporters with significant water footprints or marine dependencies; complements CDP water disclosure and water-stewardship standards.
Why it matters
Water risk is among the most location-specific and financially material environmental issues; E3 makes it a standard disclosure object.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.