Sustainability measurement & disclosure
ESRS E2
The European Sustainability Reporting Standard setting disclosure requirements on pollution.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
ESRS E2 is the topical European Sustainability Reporting Standard on pollution, adopted under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772. It covers pollution of air, water and soil, substances of concern and substances of very high concern, and microplastics — spanning the undertaking's own operations and its value chain.
References
standard scope, phase-ins
Delegated Regulation 2023/2772, first set
Overview
What it means
Disclosures follow the ESRS architecture (policies, actions, targets, metrics), including pollution quantities emitted and information on substances of concern; the quantitative disclosure on substances of concern (E2-5) benefits from extended phase-in provisions. E2 applies where pollution is assessed as material under double materiality.
How it is used
Used by CSRD reporters with material pollution impacts, particularly in manufacturing, chemicals, agriculture and waste sectors.
Why it matters
It brings pollutant emissions and hazardous substances into mainstream corporate disclosure, complementing existing E-PRTR industrial reporting.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.