Sustainable finance & investment
ESG integration
The explicit and systematic inclusion of ESG issues in investment analysis and decisions (PRI definition).
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
ESG integration is the explicit and systematic inclusion of environmental, social and governance issues in investment analysis and investment decisions, as defined by the UN Principles for Responsible Investment. It treats financially material ESG information as an input to valuation and risk management, rather than as an ethical screen.
References
definition, practice framing
Overview
What it means
Integration is distinct from exclusionary screening and from impact investing: an investor may hold a weak-ESG stock if financial analysis justifies it. The goal is better-informed decisions and improved risk-adjusted returns, though investors also cite client demand and regulation. Practice ranges from qualitative judgement to quantified adjustments of cash flows, discount rates or weights.
How it is used
Applied across equities, fixed income and other asset classes; documented in PRI reporting and manager selection; referenced in fiduciary-duty guidance.
Why it matters
It is the most widespread responsible-investment practice and the main channel through which ESG information reaches capital allocation.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.