Strategy, Targets & Performance Management
Eco-efficiency
The WBCSD's 1992 management concept: creating more value with less environmental impact — producing more with fewer resources and less waste.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Eco-efficiency is a management concept defined by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (1992) as being achieved by the delivery of competitively priced goods and services that satisfy human needs and bring quality of life, while progressively reducing ecological impacts and resource intensity throughout the life cycle to a level at least in line with the Earth's estimated carrying capacity. In short: creating more value with less impact, measurable as a ratio of value created to environmental load.
References
Overview
What it means
Doing more with less — the efficiency strategy of sustainable business, in contrast to sufficiency strategies that question volume itself.
How it is used
Companies apply eco-efficiency to energy, water and material productivity; it underpins cleaner production programmes and intensity targets, and is critiqued by degrowth scholars for enabling rebound effects.
Why it matters
Eco-efficiency was the founding vocabulary of business sustainability and remains the logic behind most corporate resource-productivity programmes.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.