Strategy, Targets & Performance Management
Diffusion of innovations
Everett Rogers's theory of how innovations spread through a social system over time, classifying adopters from innovators (2.5%) to laggards (16%).
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Diffusion of innovations is the theory, set out by Everett Rogers (1962; 5th ed. 2003), that an innovation spreads by being communicated through channels over time among members of a social system. Adoption follows a bell curve segmented into five adopter categories: innovators (2.5 per cent), early adopters (13.5 per cent), early majority (34 per cent), late majority (34 per cent) and laggards (16 per cent). Adoption speed depends on an innovation's relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability.
References
adopter categories and S-curve
Rogers definition and category shares
Overview
What it means
New sustainable technologies and practices follow predictable adoption patterns, so interventions can be targeted at the categories that accelerate spread.
How it is used
The theory informs clean-technology deployment strategies, behaviour-change campaigns and market-transformation programmes for efficient products and practices.
Why it matters
It is the reference model for understanding how sustainability innovations move from niches to the mainstream.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.