Biodiversity & Nature

De-extinction

Attempts to create functional proxies of extinct species through back-breeding, cloning or genome engineering — guided by IUCN principles and contested in conservation.

Emerging · Version 0.1

Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yet

Definition

De-extinction refers to efforts to produce organisms that resemble or functionally replace extinct species, via three pathways identified by the IUCN Species Survival Commission's 2016 Guiding Principles on Creating Proxies of Extinct Species: selective back-breeding, cloning, and genome engineering. The products are proxies — ecological analogues — rather than exact recreations of the lost species.

References

Aeon

2025 developments and IUCN WCC context

Overview

What it means

Using biotechnology to restore ecological functions lost with extinct species, while accepting that what returns is a proxy, not the original.

How it is used

Projects such as efforts around the woolly mammoth and the 2025 Colossal Biosciences "dire wolf" announcement have made the field prominent; the IUCN World Conservation Congress (Abu Dhabi 2025) addressed synthetic-biology policy in this context.

**Note:** De-extinction is contested: critics argue it diverts resources from preventing extinction and creates moral hazard; proponents frame proxies as tools for restoring ecosystem functions. The term should be read as covering proxies, not literal resurrection.

Why it matters

De-extinction forces conservation to define what recovery means in the genomic age, with real governance consequences for biodiversity policy.

Review

Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.

0
How people contribute

Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.

How comments are used

Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.

What gets published

Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.

No verified experts yet

Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.

Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.

Endorse this definition

Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.

v0.1

Sign-in supplies your email for verification and necessary follow-up; it is not displayed publicly. We do not ask you to enter it again.

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

Review board

Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.

1Separate reviewer cards

Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.

2AI comparison

AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.

3Editor synthesis

An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.

Text to reviewChoose the exact definition or overview paragraph.
Reviewer commentDraft only. Not public until editor accepted.
Definition
Reviewer identityYour signed-in account identifies the submission. We use its email only for verification and necessary follow-up, and never display it publicly.
Before you submit

This proposal follows the editorial and AI-assistance rules. The live definition will not change until an editor accepts it.

  • Add the proposed wording or note.
  • Explain why the change is needed.
  • Ready
  • Ready

Sign in with a passwordless email link before submitting.

You can still save a draft, but completing these items makes editorial review faster. Multiple reviewers can suggest changes on the same text. Editors compare, merge, accept or decline them before any public change.