Water, Waste & Pollution
Concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO)
A US regulatory category for large-scale confined livestock operations whose waste streams pose significant water, air and climate risks.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A concentrated animal feeding operation is a US EPA regulatory designation for an animal feeding operation — where animals are confined and fed for 45 days or more in a 12-month period on land without sustained vegetation — that meets size thresholds (for large CAFOs, e.g. 1,000 cattle, 700 dairy cows, 2,500 hogs or 30,000 laying hens) or is designated a significant pollution contributor. CAFOs are regulated under the Clean Water Act's NPDES permitting programme.
References
AFO definition; NPDES regulation of CAFOs
size thresholds; water/air/soil impacts; methane share
Overview
What it means
The category recognises that concentrating thousands of animals concentrates manure, nutrients and emissions at pollution scale.
How it is used
CAFO permits govern manure management and discharge; the designation anchors debates on water contamination, air pollution, methane (US agriculture is the largest domestic methane source) and animal welfare.
Why it matters
CAFOs are a leading source of nutrient pollution and a major climate and community-health concern in intensive agriculture.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.