Regulation & International Instruments
Common heritage of humankind
A principle of international law holding that certain global spaces and resources belong to all humanity and must be managed for shared benefit.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
The common heritage of humankind is a legal principle under which designated areas — notably the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction (UNCLOS Part XI) and, in treaty language, celestial bodies (Outer Space Treaty Art. 1; Moon Agreement Art. 11) — cannot be appropriated by any state and must be used peacefully for the benefit of all, with benefits shared. Maltese ambassador Arvid Pardo proposed the principle for the seabed to the UN in 1967.
References
Outer Space Treaty and Moon Agreement provisions
UNCLOS Part XI; Pardo 1967; International Seabed Authority; non-appropriation
Overview
What it means
It creates a third status beyond national control and open access: collective stewardship with benefit-sharing.
How it is used
It is implemented through the International Seabed Authority for deep-sea minerals and debated in relation to space resources, biodiversity beyond national jurisdiction and genetic resources.
Why it matters
It is the legal foundation for equity claims over resources of the global commons, increasingly contested as deep-sea mining advances.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.