Climate & Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Climate-proofing
A systematic process for ensuring that infrastructure and investments are resilient to current and future climate conditions.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Climate-proofing is the structured screening and analysis of policies, projects and investments to verify that they will remain viable under projected climate change. The European Commission's 2021 technical guidance defines a two-pillar process — mitigation consistency and adaptation/resilience — applied through screening and, where needed, detailed analysis for 2021–2027 programming.
References
two-pillar process; screening and detailed analysis; covered funding instruments
policy status and scope
Overview
What it means
It turns climate scenarios into practical go/no-go checks for infrastructure financed with public money.
How it is used
Required for major projects under EU instruments such as InvestEU, the Connecting Europe Facility, the European Regional Development Fund and the Just Transition Fund.
Why it matters
It prevents lock-in of assets that would fail or become uneconomic under future climate conditions.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.