Governance, Ethics & Risk
Climate governance
The structures, rules and accountability arrangements — in companies, governments and international institutions — through which climate risks, targets and decisions are directed and controlled.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
The set of rules, practices, institutions and accountability mechanisms by which organisations and societies direct and oversee responses to climate change. At corporate level it means board responsibility for climate risk and strategy (articulated in the World Economic Forum's Climate Governance Principles); at public and international level it covers the treaties, ministries, laws and multi-level arrangements that produce climate policy.
References
Definition; WEF Climate Governance Principles (eight elements); governmental governance via MEAs; accountability gaps; subnational and city networks.
Public-sector climate governance principles (accountability, structure, strategic integration, incentivisation, transparency).
Overview
What it means
Climate governance operates at two linked levels.
In boardrooms, the WEF's eight principles — climate accountability at board level, command of the subject, board structure, material risk/opportunity assessment, strategic integration, incentivisation, reporting and disclosure, and exchange — have become the reference standard for what "board oversight of climate" concretely means, and are embedded in TCFD's governance pillar and benchmark tools like the CA100+ Net Zero Company Benchmark.
In public governance, the term covers the UNFCCC–Paris architecture, national framework climate laws, independent climate councils, and the polycentric layer of cities, states and investors acting below and beside national governments. The accountability gap — agreements without enforcement — is its perennial critique.
How it is used
Boards adopt climate-governance structures (committees, expertise, incentive links); regulators embed governance expectations in disclosure and prudential rules; governance quality is scored in investor benchmarks; scholars analyse polycentric climate governance across levels.
Why it matters
Targets without governance are wishes; climate governance is the machinery that determines who inside an institution or system actually owns the transition.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.