Development, Impact & Global Frameworks
Climate education
The integration of climate knowledge, skills and values into formal and informal education — a recognised pillar of the global climate response under SDG 4.7 and UNFCCC Action for Climate Empowerment.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Education that equips learners with the knowledge, skills, values and attitudes to understand and act on climate change — spanning school curricula, teacher training, technical and vocational education, higher education and lifelong learning. It is advanced internationally through SDG target 4.7, the UNFCCC's Action for Climate Empowerment (ACE) agenda, and UNESCO's Greening Education Partnership.
References
Overview
What it means
Climate education is increasingly framed as climate infrastructure: UNESCO's Greening Education Partnership — joined by around 99 countries and over 2,000 organisations — works across four pillars (greening schools, curricula, teacher training and communities) with a target of transforming 50% of schools into green schools by 2030.
The gap is stark: reviews of national curriculum frameworks in 131 countries find environmental content nearly universal but shallow, with climate change and biodiversity often thin or absent; and education receives less than 2% of total climate finance despite its multiplier role.
"Climate literacy" denotes the intended outcome — an individual's understanding of climate systems and capacity for informed decisions — and is treated here within this entry rather than separately.
How it is used
Ministries integrate climate into curricula and teacher standards; the GEP dashboard tracks national progress; ACE focal points embed education in NDCs; universities and TVET systems build green-skills pipelines; non-formal providers (scouting, museums, media) extend reach.
Why it matters
Every other climate solution runs on people who understand the problem; climate education is the slow, foundational investment on which decades of policy and behaviour depend.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.