Climate & Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Carbon negative
Removing more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than is emitted — a claim category beyond carbon neutrality, popularised by corporate pledges such as Microsoft's 2030 commitment.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A state in which an entity's removals of CO₂ from the atmosphere exceed its emissions over a defined period — going beyond carbon neutrality (balancing emissions with removals/offsets) to achieve a net withdrawal. The term came to prominence with Microsoft's 2020 pledge to be carbon negative by 2030 across Scopes 1–3 and to remove its historical emissions by 2050.
References
Definition via flagship pledge (carbon negative by 2030, all scopes; historical removal by 2050).
Hierarchy net zero / carbon neutral / carbon negative; removals-exceed-emissions criterion.
Overview
What it means
Unlike carbon neutrality — governed by ISO 14068-1 — and net zero — governed by frameworks such as SBTi's — carbon negative has no governing standard, so the claim's credibility depends entirely on disclosed methodology: boundary (which scopes), removal quality (durable removals vs avoidance credits) and verification.
"Climate positive" is widely treated as interchangeable, though some frameworks reserve it for broader multi-pollutant impact; conversely "carbon positive" is confusingly used in opposite senses (net emitter vs net remover) and is best avoided. Green-claims regulation increasingly subjects such terminology to substantiation duties.
How it is used
Companies adopt carbon-negative/climate-positive targets as ambition signals beyond net zero; practitioners assess them against Oxford Offsetting Principles-style portfolios weighted toward durable removals.
Why it matters
As net zero becomes the baseline expectation, "beyond neutral" claims define the frontier of corporate climate ambition — and, unstandardised, a frontier of greenwashing risk. **Note on differing definitions or controversy:** No governing standard exists; equivalence with "climate positive" varies by framework, and claim substantiation requirements are tightening.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.