Regulation & International Instruments
California climate disclosure laws (SB 253 / SB 261)
Paired 2023 California laws requiring large companies doing business in the state to disclose full value-chain emissions (SB 253) and biennial climate-related financial risk reports (SB 261).
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Two California laws signed in October 2023 (amended by SB 219 in 2024) establishing the first broad US corporate climate-disclosure regime. SB 253 requires companies with over US$1 billion in revenue doing business in California to report Scope 1, 2 and 3 greenhouse-gas emissions with phased assurance. SB 261 requires companies with over US$500 million in revenue to publish biennial climate-related financial risk reports aligned with TCFD-style frameworks.
References
Signing and SB 219 amendments; CARB 2025–26 workshops; Feb 2026 board approval; June 2026 withdrawal and deadline-shift proposal; Ninth Circuit injunction status; 2027 Scope 3 and assurance proposals; penalty levels; ~5,400 covered-entity estimate.
July 2026 modified regulation and 15-day comment period.
Overview
What it means
The laws extend disclosure duties to thousands of companies — CARB has estimated roughly 5,400 entities under SB 253 — based on doing business in California rather than listing status.
Implementation has been turbulent: CARB's initial regulation was approved by its board in February 2026, then withdrawn in June 2026 with a proposal to move the first Scope 1 and 2 deadline from 10 August to 10 November 2026, followed by a modified regulation and further comment period in July 2026; proposals for 2027 phase in five Scope 3 categories with limited assurance under recognised assurance standards.
SB 261 enforcement was stayed by a Ninth Circuit injunction (November 2025) in the US Chamber of Commerce challenge, unresolved as of mid-2026. Penalties can reach $500,000 (SB 253) and $50,000 (SB 261) per reporting year; CARB signalled good-faith-enforcement leniency for first-year Scope 1 and 2 reports.
How it is used
Companies map in-state nexus, build emissions-inventory and assurance readiness, and monitor CARB rulemaking; the laws are the benchmark against which other US state proposals and federal inaction are measured, and a compliance bridge toward ISSB-style reporting.
Why it matters
With federal US climate disclosure stalled, California's laws — covering much of the US economy by revenue — are the functioning centre of American corporate climate disclosure and a live test of state-level regulatory power.
Definitions and controversy
Statutory thresholds, deadlines and litigation status were in flux through 2026; this entry reflects the position as at August 2026 and should be refreshed as CARB rulemaking and the Ninth Circuit case conclude.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.