Coffee, Cocoa & Agricultural Commodities
C.A.F.E. Practices
Starbucks' coffee-sourcing verification programme, developed with Conservation International, scoring farms and mills against economic, social and environmental criteria through third-party audits.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) Practices: a coffee-sourcing verification programme developed by Starbucks with Conservation International, originating in shade-coffee collaboration in southern Mexico. It evaluates coffee farms and mills against scorecards spanning economic transparency, social responsibility and environmental leadership, with inspections performed by third-party verification organisations trained and approved by SCS Global Services.
References
CI–Starbucks development from southern-Mexico shade-coffee work; verification programme measuring economic, social and environmental criteria; third-party audits trained/approved by SCS Global Services; CI's advisory (non-audit) role and independent results assessments since 2008.
Overview
What it means
C. A. F. E. Practices is the most prominent example of a company-owned commodity sourcing standard: rather than adopting an external certification, Starbucks built its own criteria — quality and economic transparency as prerequisites, then social and environmental performance tiers — while outsourcing verification to independent auditors.
Conservation International advises on the programme and has assessed its results independently since 2008 but does not itself audit. The programme underpins Starbucks' claim that the overwhelming majority of its arabica coffee is "ethically sourced"; critics note the limits of company-defined standards versus independent certification.
How it is used
Starbucks requires C. A. F. E. Practices verification across its arabica supply chain; agronomists and farmer support centres work with suppliers on scorecard compliance; the programme is a reference case in debates over private standards versus multi-stakeholder certification.
Why it matters
C. A. F. E. Practices shows both the power and the accountability questions of buyer-defined sustainability standards in global commodity chains — scale and integration on one side, independence on the other.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.