Biodiversity & Nature
Bioprospecting
The systematic search for commercially valuable genetic resources and biochemical compounds in plants, animals and microorganisms.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
The exploration of biodiversity for commercially valuable genetic resources and biochemicals — the search for plants, animals and microbial species for pharmaceutical, biotechnological, agricultural and industrial purposes, including the collection of associated traditional knowledge from local communities. Intent to commercialise is what distinguishes bioprospecting from pure scientific collection.
References
Definition; four-phase process; NCI screening programmes; efficiency of traditional-knowledge-guided collection; biopiracy boundary.
Commercial-intent definition; scope (all organisms plus traditional knowledge); overharvesting risk.
Overview
What it means
Bioprospecting typically proceeds through phases: on-site collection; culturing and isolation of compounds; screening for specific uses; and product development, including patenting and marketing.
Natural products remain foundational to drug discovery — analyses of FDA approvals find that around half of approved drugs are natural products or their derivatives — which gives biodiverse regions an "option value" as libraries of evolved chemistry.
How it is used
Governed today by the CBD and Nagoya Protocol's access-and-benefit-sharing rules: legitimate bioprospecting requires prior informed consent and mutually agreed benefit-sharing with provider countries and communities. Programmes range from national institutes' screening collections (e. g. , the US NCI's Natural Product Repository) to commercial agreements like the historic Merck–INBio deal in Costa Rica.
Why it matters
Bioprospecting is the commercial frontier of the biodiversity economy: managed well, it finances conservation and rewards traditional knowledge; managed badly, it becomes biopiracy. The distinction is a core governance test for nature-positive business.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.