Biodiversity & Nature
Biodiversity hotspot
A region that is both exceptionally rich in species found nowhere else and exceptionally threatened — 36 such hotspots guide global conservation priority-setting.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A biogeographic region meeting two strict criteria set by Conservation International: at least 1,500 endemic vascular plant species (plants found nowhere else), and 30% or less of its original natural vegetation remaining. Thirty-six regions qualify, from Madagascar to the Tropical Andes; the concept originates with ecologist Norman Myers (1988), formalised in a 2000 Nature paper.
References
Two criteria (≥1,500 endemic plants; ≤30% original vegetation); 36 hotspots; 2.5% of land surface; endemic-species shares.
Overview
What it means
The criteria encode a dual logic — irreplaceability and vulnerability. The 36 hotspots cover only about 2. 5% of Earth's land surface but hold more than half of the world's endemic plant species and nearly 43% of endemic bird, mammal, reptile and amphibian species. Conservation in these areas yields outsized returns per dollar — the framework's explicit purpose is prioritisation under scarcity.
How it is used
Hotspots channel funding from Conservation International's Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, GEF programmes and national protected-area planning. The concept complements finer-scale designations such as Key Biodiversity Areas, many of which sit within hotspots.
Why it matters
The hotspot concept proved that conservation triage works: it shaped two decades of conservation geography and remains the most influential prioritisation framework — though critics note it under-weights wilderness areas with low endemism and ecosystem services elsewhere.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.