Water, Waste & Pollution
Bioaccumulation
The build-up of substances such as mercury or persistent organic pollutants in an organism's tissues over time — faster intake than the body can eliminate.
Definition
The process by which chemicals accumulate in a living organism when the rate of uptake — from water, food, sediment or air — exceeds the rate of elimination. It concerns especially persistent, fat-soluble substances (methylmercury, PCBs, DDT and other persistent organic pollutants) that the body cannot readily break down or excrete. Bioaccumulation within one organism is distinct from biomagnification: the increase in concentration from one trophic level to the next up a food chain.
References
Definitions of both processes; fat-solubility mechanism; mercury example; DDT and PCB cases.
POPs behaviour; food-web transfer from phytoplankton up trophic levels.
Overview
What it means
The two processes compound: a pollutant that bioaccumulates in plankton and small fish biomagnifies to concentrations in predatory fish, birds and humans that can be orders of magnitude higher than in the surrounding water — the mechanism behind fish-consumption advisories for mercury and the eggshell-thinning crisis caused by DDT.
Legacy pollutants banned decades ago still circulate through food webs because persistence is what makes them accumulate.
How it is used
Bioaccumulation potential is a core screening criterion in chemical regulation — the "B" in PBT (persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic) assessment under regimes such as REACH and the Stockholm Convention. Monitoring programmes measure tissue concentrations in indicator species.
Why it matters
Bioaccumulation is why dilute pollution is not safe pollution: substances released at trace levels can concentrate to harmful doses in wildlife and people, particularly communities dependent on fish. It underpins the regulatory logic of eliminating persistent chemicals at source.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.