Regulation & International Instruments
Biennial transparency report (BTR)
The single two-yearly report all Paris Agreement Parties must submit under the enhanced transparency framework, covering emissions, NDC progress, adaptation and support.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
The reporting vehicle of the Paris Agreement's enhanced transparency framework (ETF, Article 13), submitted by all Parties every two years — the first by 31 December 2024, the second by 31 December 2026. Per the modalities, procedures and guidelines (decision 18/CMA.1), BTRs cover the national inventory report, information to track NDC progress, policies and measures, climate impacts and adaptation, and support provided, mobilised, needed and received, using common tabular formats.
References
Overview
What it means
The BTR replaces the differentiated BR/BUR system with one format for all, plus built-in flexibility for developing countries that need it; small island developing states and least developed countries may report at their discretion. Reports undergo technical expert review and facilitative, multilateral consideration of progress.
Content includes textual chapters plus common reporting tables (inventories) and common tabular formats (NDC tracking and support), with optional technical annexes for REDD+ results.
How it is used
BTRs feed the global stocktake, inform successive NDCs, and create the public record against which countries' climate performance is judged. The first round revealed both achievement and strain: many developing countries reported for the first time, with capacity support from initiatives such as the Partnership on Transparency in the Paris Agreement.
Why it matters
The Paris Agreement runs on trust built through transparency; the BTR is its core accountability instrument — the mechanism by which "pledge and review" becomes verifiable.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.