Regulation & International Instruments
Biennial report / Biennial update report (BR / BUR)
The UNFCCC's former two-yearly reporting instruments — BRs for developed countries, BURs for developing countries — superseded by the Paris Agreement's biennial transparency reports.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
Biennial reports (BRs) were submitted by developed country Parties and biennial update reports (BURs) by developing country (non-Annex I) Parties under the Convention's measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) framework established by the 2010 Cancun Agreements. BURs contained updated national GHG inventories, information on mitigation actions and their effects, and needs and support received; BRs covered developed countries' progress toward emission targets and support provided.
References
Overview
What it means
The BR/BUR system embedded differentiation: different reports, review processes (international assessment and review for developed countries; international consultation and analysis for developing countries) and flexibility for least developed countries and small island states.
Under the Paris Agreement's enhanced transparency framework (ETF), both were superseded by the single biennial transparency report (BTR) format for all Parties, with flexibility for those that need it — the first BTRs were due by 31 December 2024.
How it is used
BRs and BURs remain historically important: they built developing-country reporting capacity (the first BURs were due December 2014), and their review processes created the expert-review culture the ETF now inherits. Final BURs/BRs marked the transition point to the ETF.
Why it matters
Understanding the BR/BUR era explains the design compromises of today's transparency system — and provides the archive of pre-Paris national climate reporting that long-term assessments still draw on.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.