Development, Impact & Global Frameworks
Better Life Index
The OECD's interactive well-being tool comparing countries across 11 dimensions of life — a flagship of efforts to measure progress beyond GDP.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
An interactive index published by the OECD since 2011 that compares countries on 11 dimensions of current well-being — including income, jobs, housing, health, education, environment, safety, work-life balance, social connections and life satisfaction — allowing users to weight dimensions according to their own priorities. It operationalises the OECD Well-being Framework, which also tracks four types of resources (economic, natural, social, human capital) for future well-being.
References
11 dimensions of current well-being; four future-well-being resources; 80+ indicators; user weighting; 2011 origin.
Overview
What it means
The Index's distinctive feature is user-determined weighting: rather than imposing a single composite score, it shows how country rankings shift depending on what people value. Behind it sits the OECD Well-being Database of more than 80 indicators, updated quarterly.
The framework deliberately separates current well-being from the capital stocks that sustain it — embedding sustainability in the measurement architecture.
How it is used
Policymakers use the framework to design national well-being initiatives (adopted in various forms by numerous OECD countries); researchers and media use the Index for cross-country comparison; it is a standard reference in "beyond GDP" debates, including the UN High-Level Expert Group process.
Why it matters
The BLI demonstrated that multidimensional, people-centred progress measurement is practical at national scale — paving the way for well-being budgets and the current UN beyond-GDP dashboard effort.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.