Governance, Ethics & Risk
Benefit Corporation
A US corporate legal form, created by state statute since 2010, that requires directors to consider all stakeholders — not only shareholders — and to pursue a general public benefit purpose.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A legal corporate status administered by US states (and adopted in various forms elsewhere), layered onto traditional incorporation. Benefit corporation statutes build in three obligations: purpose (creating a material positive impact on society and the environment — a "general public benefit"), accountability (directors must consider the effects of decisions on all stakeholders — workers, suppliers, communities, the environment — not just shareholders), and transparency (an annual public benefit report assessed against a credible third-party standard).
References
Legal-status definition; purpose/accountability/transparency tenets; Maryland 2010 origin; distinction from B Corp certification; shareholder primacy context.
Overview
What it means
The form was created by B Lab's founders to give mission-driven companies a way out of shareholder primacy — the doctrine that directors' sole fiduciary duty is maximising shareholder value. It was first passed into law in Maryland in 2010 and has since spread across most US states and other jurisdictions.
Note the persistent confusion: a benefit corporation is a legal status, while B Corp is a private certification; neither requires the other, though the legal form is one route to meeting B Corp certification's stakeholder-governance requirement.
How it is used
Companies adopt the form by amending formation documents; well-known adopters include Patagonia and Kickstarter. Investors and courts use the statute's expanded fiduciary frame to protect mission-driven decisions.
Why it matters
Benefit corporation law is the most widespread legal embedding of stakeholder governance — the structural answer to the claim that sustainability commitments are legally unsafe under shareholder primacy.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.