Carbon Markets & Offsetting
Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs)
Australia's national carbon credit unit — one ACCU per tonne of CO₂-equivalent avoided or removed — issued under the ACCU Scheme and tradable in voluntary and compliance markets.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A regulated, tradeable carbon unit issued by Australia's Clean Energy Regulator, each representing one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent stored or avoided by a registered project under the ACCU Scheme, established by the Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011. Projects span vegetation management, agriculture, forestry, energy, waste, transport and industrial processes.
References
Scheme purpose and eligible project types; CFI Act 2011 basis; six Offset Integrity Standards.
One ACCU per tCO₂-e; secondary-market and government sales; Safeguard Mechanism demand.
Dual-track design with Safeguard Mechanism; ACCUs as financial products under the Corporations Act; oversight bodies.
Overview
What it means
The scheme is one of the world's longest-running national crediting systems (previously known through the Emissions Reduction Fund). Methods — legislated rules for calculating abatement — must meet six Offset Integrity Standards, including additionality and conservativeness.
Sequestration projects carry permanence obligations (25- or 100-year periods, with a 5% risk-of-reversal buffer and a 20% discount for 25-year projects).
How it is used
Participants earn ACCUs after verified reporting and can sell them on the secondary market or to the government under carbon abatement contracts. Demand comes from voluntary buyers and from compliance: facilities covered by the Safeguard Mechanism (emitting over 100,000 tCO₂-e per year) surrender ACCUs against declining baselines. ACCUs are regulated as financial products.
Why it matters
ACCUs are central to Australia's net-zero strategy and a test case for national crediting integrity — the scheme underwent an independent review (the 2022 Chubb Review) and triennial Climate Change Authority reviews after criticism of method integrity.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.