Sustainable Finance & Investment
Asset allocation
The decision of how to divide an investment portfolio across asset classes such as equities, bonds and cash — the primary driver of a portfolio's risk, return and, increasingly, its sustainability profile.
Definition
The process of deciding what proportion of a portfolio to invest in different asset classes — stocks, bonds, cash equivalents and alternatives such as real estate or commodities — based on the investor's goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. It is distinct from diversification, which spreads investments within asset classes.
References
Definition; distinction from diversification and rebalancing; risk-management role.
Allocation across broad investment types by goals, horizon and risk tolerance; relationship to diversification.
Overview
What it means
Asset allocation is considered the dominant determinant of long-run portfolio risk and return. In sustainable finance, allocation decisions are where climate and sustainability commitments become concrete: setting targets for green bond shares, capping fossil-fuel exposure, or allocating to transition and impact strategies all operate at the asset-allocation level.
How it is used
Institutional investors set strategic asset allocations reviewed periodically, then rebalance to targets. Sustainability-linked policies — such as net-zero portfolio targets — are implemented by adjusting allocations across asset classes, sectors and regions, alongside stewardship and selection decisions.
Why it matters
Because allocation steers capital at the largest scale, it is the point where investor commitments (net zero, SDG alignment) translate into real-economy financing. Misallocation — for example continued exposure to assets at risk of stranding — is where climate financial risk concentrates.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and an editorial decision to attribute them.
Submitted reviews stay private until an editor decides whether to accept and attribute them.
Contribute to this entry
Help improve this definition
Your contribution is private while it is checked. Nothing changes on this page unless an editor accepts it.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.