Regulation & International Instruments
Asia-Pacific Group
One of the five UN regional groups, comprising 53 member states from Asia and the Pacific, used to allocate seats and coordinate positions across UN bodies including climate processes.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
The UN regional group covering member states from Asia and the Pacific, currently 53 members. UN regional groups exist to facilitate equitable geographical distribution of seats in UN bodies — from the Security Council to treaty bureaux — and also serve as coordination channels on substantive issues.
References
Five regional groups; Asia-Pacific Group of 53 member states; electoral purpose and coordination role; monthly rotating chairs.
Regional-group seat allocation practices; GA resolution 1991 (XVIII) origins.
Overview
What it means
Regional groups formally handle elections and ceremonial functions, with chairs rotating monthly, but they also coordinate on substance. In UN climate and environment processes, the Asia-Pacific Group nominates members to bodies such as the UNFCCC Bureau, and its members participate in negotiations both through the group and through cross-cutting coalitions (G77, AOSIS, LDC Group).
How it is used
The group's endorsement is typically required for Asia-Pacific candidates to UN posts; group consultations shape regionally balanced appointments in environmental agreements. Regional groups should not be confused with negotiating coalitions, which cut across them.
Why it matters
Understanding regional groups clarifies how representation and voice are organised in international environmental governance — and how small states gain access to decision-making bodies. (Note: the acronym "APG" is shared with the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering, an unrelated body; this entry covers the UN regional group.)
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.