Governance, Ethics & Risk
Anticipatory governance
A governance approach that builds the capacity to explore uncertain futures, experiment and continuously learn, rather than reacting to problems once they are clear.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A broad-based capacity within a governance system to actively explore possibilities, experiment and continuously learn. Developed prominently in OECD work on public-sector innovation, it addresses "unknowable" futures — such as climate change or pandemics — that classic, sequential policy steering handles poorly.
References
Definition; uncertainty vs risk; foresight-experimentation link; comparison with traditional policy making; Finland assessment.
Overview
What it means
Traditional policy making assumes problems can be identified, analysed and solved in order; anticipatory governance assumes deep uncertainty and treats policy itself as exploration. It pairs strategic foresight (systematically engaging with alternative futures) with small-scale real-world experiments and feedback loops, so that policy alternatives are tested rather than merely drafted.
Anticipation here means rehearsing possibilities, not predicting the future.
How it is used
Governments apply the model through foresight units, regulatory sandboxes and experimentation portfolios; the OECD assessed Finland's government against an anticipatory innovation governance framework in 2022. The approach is invoked in missions-oriented policy, resilience planning and long-term risk governance.
Why it matters
Sustainability challenges are long-term, systemic and uncertain; institutions built for stable, short-cycle problems systematically under-prepare. Anticipatory governance offers a concrete operating model for acting under uncertainty — complementing, and often paired with, adaptive management.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.