Governance, Ethics & Risk
Anti-Corruption Policy
A company's formal framework for preventing, detecting and responding to bribery and corruption, expected under the UN Global Compact's tenth principle and sustainability reporting standards.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A documented set of commitments, rules and procedures by which an organisation works against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery. It typically covers risk assessment, gifts and hospitality rules, third-party due diligence, reporting channels and disciplinary measures, and is a core element of governance disclosure.
References
Tenth principle text; corruption's development impacts; internal/external/collective-action expectations.
Three elements for companies: internal policies and programmes, external reporting, collective action.
Overview
What it means
The UN Global Compact's tenth principle — derived from the UN Convention Against Corruption — calls on businesses to work against corruption in all its forms, starting with internal policies and programmes. Corruption is treated as a sustainability issue because it undermines development, distorts markets, raises costs and disproportionately harms poor communities.
How it is used
Companies disclose their anti-corruption policies and incidents under GRI 205; many certify management systems to ISO 37001 (anti-bribery); investors screen for policy quality in ESG assessments. The UN Global Compact asks signatories to report progress annually and to join collective-action initiatives with peers and governments.
Why it matters
Corruption erodes every other sustainability outcome — from fair labour to environmental enforcement. A credible policy is the baseline defence against legal exposure (for example under the US FCPA or UK Bribery Act) and against the governance failures that enable greenwashing and rights abuses in supply chains.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.