Carbon Markets & Offsetting
American Carbon Registry (ACR)
A US-based non-profit carbon crediting programme, founded in 1996 as the world's first private voluntary greenhouse gas registry, operating in both voluntary and compliance markets.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A carbon crediting programme and registry operated by the non-profit Winrock International. ACR approves methodologies, oversees registration and independent verification of emission reduction and removal projects, and records issuance, transfer and retirement of serialised carbon credits. Founded in 1996, it describes itself as the first private voluntary GHG registry in the world.
References
Mission; role (methodologies, verification oversight, registry functions); founded 1996 as first private voluntary GHG registry; compliance and voluntary market operation.
Non-profit enterprise of Winrock; sectors covered (forestry and land use, energy, industrial); science-based methodologies.
ERT heritage; governance model; ICVCM CCP labelling; relationship to ART under Winrock.
Overview
What it means
ACR grew out of Winrock's Environmental Resources Trust registry (also 1996) and is one of the longest-running offset programmes, alongside peers such as Verra, Gold Standard and the Climate Action Reserve. Its credits have been used in voluntary markets and in compliance contexts such as California's cap-and-trade programme and international aviation offsetting (CORSIA).
How it is used
Project developers register projects under ACR methodologies; credits are issued after third-party verification and retired by buyers making climate claims. ACR has emphasised "integrity-era" positioning, including early adoption of ICVCM Core Carbon Principles labelling for eligible credits.
Why it matters
Registries are the plumbing of carbon markets: their rules determine what counts as a tonne reduced or removed. ACR's age and non-profit governance make it a reference point in debates about offset quality, double counting and market integrity.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.