Supply Chain & Due Diligence
Accountability Framework initiative (AFi)
A civil-society coalition that publishes the Accountability Framework — consensus-based guidance for companies to set, implement and disclose commitments on deforestation, ecosystem conversion and human rights.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
A coalition of civil society organisations that develops and maintains the Accountability Framework: twelve Core Principles supported by Operational Guidance and common Definitions for ethical agricultural and forestry supply chains. The Framework was first released in June 2019; the initiative's secretariat is co-led by the Rainforest Alliance and the Meridian Institute.
References
Scope (deforestation, conversion, human rights of Indigenous Peoples, local communities and workers); usage by hundreds of companies and initiatives.
Twelve Core Principles and their structure; remediation and access to remedy (CP9); monitoring, verification, reporting and claims (CP11–12).
2025 target-date recommendation; 22-organisation coalition call to action; CDP alignment.
Overview
What it means
The Framework organises company action in three stages — set commitments (protect forests and other natural ecosystems; respect human rights including those of Indigenous Peoples, local communities and workers; specify commitments), take action (implementation systems, traceability, compliance management, responsible land practices, remediation, collaboration) and demonstrate progress (monitoring, verification, reporting and claims).
How it is used
Hundreds of companies, industry groups, NGOs and initiatives have used or applied the Framework. CDP disclosure indicators are aligned with it, and initiatives such as WWF-Australia have produced Framework-aligned guidance for deforestation-free assessment. The AFi recommended a 2025 target date for eliminating deforestation from agricultural and forestry supply chains.
Why it matters
Before the Framework, companies faced inconsistent expectations for no-deforestation and human-rights commitments. The AFi harmonised definitions and good practice across commodities, providing a common reference point for voluntary commitments that also interact with regulation such as the EU Deforestation Regulation.
Definitions and controversy
The AFi is a guidance coalition, not a certification scheme; it does not itself verify company performance.
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.