Biodiversity & Nature
30x30 target
The 30x30 target is a global conservation ambition to conserve or protect at least 30 percent of land and sea areas by 2030.
Expert review openNo editor-accepted expert review yetDefinition
The 30x30 target is a global conservation ambition to conserve or protect at least 30 percent of land and sea areas by 2030.
Overview
What it means in practice
30x30 target should be read as a biodiversity and nature term. Its meaning depends on the ecosystem, geography, baseline, species or metric being used.
In practice, users should state the boundary, location, baseline and evidence source. That keeps 30x30 target specific enough for review without overstating certainty.
Why it matters
30x30 target matters because nature language can compress complex ecological conditions into a simple phrase. Clear wording helps readers understand whether the term describes status, pressure, response, target or measured outcome.
Common misconception
A common error is to use 30x30 target as a broad proof of environmental benefit. The stronger approach is to state the baseline, geography, metric, governance and limitation.
Review questions
What place, boundary or baseline gives the term meaning? What evidence supports it? What uncertainty or limitation would change the reader's interpretation?
Review
Public comments appear only after editor acceptance. Draft comments stay in the review queue.
Reviewers choose the definition or an overview paragraph, leave a comment or replacement, and attach evidence or a source link.
Editors compare reviewer cards side by side. AI may help find agreement, conflicts, unsupported claims and possible source issues.
Only an editor-accepted synthesis changes the public page. Reviewer identities are shown only with consent and verification.
Submitted reviews stay private until accepted.
Loading verified endorsements… Endorsements are not votes and never determine publication.
Endorse this definition
Endorse the exact version shown here. This is not a vote, and publication remains an editorial decision.
Review board
Comment on a specific line. Each reviewer stays separate until an editor accepts a merged draft.
Each person comments on the definition or overview in their own draft card, with role, evidence and suggested wording kept together.
AI can compare comments against the current text, flag conflicting claims, surface missing evidence and identify where reviewers agree.
An editor merges compatible suggestions into a draft change, checks sources, records disagreements and decides what can be published.